Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next
Shooter UK Version
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranthickster
Registered: January 1, 2008
United Kingdom Posts: 4
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I'm quite new to all this, so please bear with me.

I submitted a change to the dtabase on a DVD that I own. The Database currently shows that the runtime is 126min, where as the actual cover states that it is 121min. I submitted the change. 6 people ok'd it 2 didn't. The change has been rejected. Quite clearly the scan shows that the correct time is 121min and not 126min. How can this not be accepted?

This is the link to the Rejection
http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=189542&PageNum=LAST

Any advice would be appreciated.

Cheers

the EAN is 5014437929334
 Last edited: by hickster
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantTheDarkKnight
Registered: March 14, 2007
United States Posts: 762
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Maybe the running time in the database is from the actual disc, meaning somebody put it in the player and checked it. You can check the old contribution notes or put the disc in and check that.
What did the "no" voters say? They must have left a reason why they voted "no".

Dirk
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantAgrare
Registered: May 22, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,033
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
take the runtime from the actual movie not from the box...they can very often be wrong.

i had one movie, the replacements, the box said like 136 minutes and the move was only like 110 minutes or something pretty significant like that
 Last edited: by Agrare
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantVega
Registered: May 19, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 585
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Could this be the PAL speed up phenonom?

Perhaps the Region 2 profile was just copied from the Region 1 profile hence the longer running time in the profile?  Anyway, the general rule of thumb is to never trust what's on the rear covers.  They regularly get Special Features and audio/video specs wrong.  The only way to know for sure is to play the movie all the way through the end credits and see what the running time is.
"Rules are for the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" - Douglas Bader
"A common mistake that people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools." - Douglas Adams
 Last edited: by Vega
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,014
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
@ hickster:
Next time in your contribution notes please indicate how you verified the actual running time, e.g. "verified actual running time using PowerDVD" or something along these lines. This will tell both voters and Invelos screeners that you have established the real running time.

Runniing times on covers are often inaccurate; that's why your contribution may have been declined. The best option is to use your PC's DVD drive to check using whatever programme you use to play DVDs.
 Last edited: by dee1959jay
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorVoltaire53
Missed again!
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,293
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hickster:
Quote:
Any advice would be appreciated.


The comments on the No votes said it all really.

The Rules say you do not take the running time from the case, you take it from the disc because the case is often wrong.

My comment said that though I agreed 126 mins was incorrect because that was the original movie/NTSC running time and it would be shorter because of PAL speedup and I may have accepted it in some circumstances, the BBFC shows the DVD has a running time of 120 min 29 seconds so, if this is accurate (sometimes you get a few extra seconds of black on the finished DVD, sometimes you don't) the correct running time in DVD Profiler terms would actually be 120 minutes so this would be a situation where the case was wrong... or at least not accurate enough with it's Approx 121 mins comment.

FWIW this is particularly embarassing for me as I was the person who made the error when copying the US R1 profile in the first place and the running time was the one thing I forgot to change that needed it 
It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong
 Last edited: by Voltaire53
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,014
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
@ Voltaire53:
Hey, we're only human! 
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranthickster
Registered: January 1, 2008
United Kingdom Posts: 4
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Thanks for all the replies. There is some interesting stuff. I suppose it all boils down to what Info should be on the database. With all the arguments for and against. There remains one question for me.
6 votes yes
2 votes No
To me this would seem like Yes wins. But in this case it seems not.

Is there a ratio/weight system for votes?

I have tried to use the search facility for answers to my questions, but the search facility seems to be a little lacking .
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantAgrare
Registered: May 22, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,033
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
yes/no votes are just to help the screeners. ultimatly, it could be all yes and be rejected or conversly all no and get accepted. The decision is the screeners and not determined by the votes.

-Agrare
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile Registrantkdh1949
Have Gun Will Travel
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 2,394
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting hickster:
Quote:
Thanks for all the replies. There is some interesting stuff. I suppose it all boils down to what Info should be on the database.

That part is simple.  What Info should be in the database is "correct" (or accurate) data.  If the actual running time is 126 min, it doesn't matter if the box cover says 121min.  What should go in the database is 126 min.

Quote:
With all the arguments for and against. There remains one question for me.
6 votes yes
2 votes No
To me this would seem like Yes wins. But in this case it seems not.

No, Yes doesn't win if a YES vote is for inaccurate data where a NO vote is for accurate data.

Quote:
Is there a ratio/weight system for votes?

Votes for "Correct" data trump votes for "incorrect" data.

All it takes (or should take) is one NO vote that points up that the contributed data is incorrect for the screeners to reject the contribution.
Another Ken (not Ken Cole)
Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges. I don't have to show you any stinking badges.
DVD Profiler user since June 15, 2001
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranthickster
Registered: January 1, 2008
United Kingdom Posts: 4
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
If the data is invalid and the screener denies it anyway, whats the point in the vote?
 Last edited: by hickster
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributorreybr
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Norway Posts: 906
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
It's a guide to help the screeners. The screeners doesn't know or own all the DVDs in the DB  so they have to get some input from those that actually own it

They look at the votes and the comments on the votes and decides if the contribution is valid. There are many people that don't even look at the contribution before they vote and just blindly vote yes. A no vote needs to have a comment and if the screeners agrees that the contribution contains an error, it will be rejected.

The colour of her eyes, were the colour of insanity
 Last edited: by reybr
DVD Profiler Unlimited Registranthickster
Registered: January 1, 2008
United Kingdom Posts: 4
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I seeee.

How do you find the reason that the change was rejected. I have looked at the various links but can't find it.

http://www.invelos.com/Forums.aspx?task=viewtopic&topicID=189542&PageNum=LAST
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributornorthbloke
Registered: March 15, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 5,459
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
There are some automated "reasons" that will sometimes appear on your "Contributions" page (via "My Profiler") but the screeners simply don't have time to give a reason every time.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantAgrare
Registered: May 22, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United States Posts: 1,033
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
not trying to hijack the thread but since this started with run times, and seems to be resolved, i figured i'd post this curiosity here instead of starting a new thread.

I have a title 'The Replacements' upc: 085391-858522.

the back cover of my copy states run time as 135 minutes. dvd profiler has 118 (which is correct). I was just trying to reference this and checked the cover scan in the database, which looks exactly like mine as far as i can tell, except that it has 118 min as the run time. Since i just purchased this I don't think it was an error that was corrected for a later release, i realize that studios sometimes make mistakes, just seems weird that its the only difference and it would change from being correct to being incorrect.

-Agrare
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorVoltaire53
Missed again!
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 2,293
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting Agrare:
Quote:

the back cover of my copy states run time as 135 minutes. dvd profiler has 118 (which is correct). I was just trying to reference this and checked the cover scan in the database, which looks exactly like mine as far as i can tell, except that it has 118 min as the run time. Since i just purchased this I don't think it was an error that was corrected for a later release, i realize that studios sometimes make mistakes, just seems weird that its the only difference and it would change from being correct to being incorrect.


Are there 17 minutes of featurettes? Some studios have taken to putting down the total run time of all items on the disc.
It is dangerous to be right in matters where established men are wrong
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next