I would call it correct. But a screen cap of where he might be in relation to Cantamessa and Hall might change that.

Skip

Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
Quoting bigdaddyhorse:

Quote:
If Gene Cantamessa is in with the other sound credits, then he's a re-recording mixer as well.

Why? I just read in the Rules that "Production Mixer" => "Production Sound Mixer", so I guess that is the right role for Cantamessa.

It is. This translates to "production sound mixer", and it doesn't matter at all that he's credited right next to the other sound crew.

Quote:
As to Portman's,  I can't find "Production Rerecording" in the Crew credits table.

Indeed it isn't. I still feel a "sound re-recording mixer" credit is completely appropriate, though (better yet: it seems totally obvious to me). I'm also glad to see that others like Skip agree. Apparently we suddenly are allowed to use some "common sense" - I'll have to remember that... 

Quoting schaumi:

Quote:
Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
On Screen:
Production Mixer  Gene Cantamessa      
Production Rerecording  Richard Portman
Sound Editor  Don Hall

In a number of DVDP profiles:
Gene Cantamessa Production Sound Mixer
Richard Portman Sound Re-Recording Mixer
Don Hall Sound Editor


Is Portman's role right?

All three are correct in the profiles.

"Production Rerecording" is not listed in the Credits table though. And the Rule says

Quote:
For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section.

Quoting schaumi:

Quote:
So then leave out this credit! No problem.

I just confirmed that Richard Portman definitely was the Re-Recording Mixer on YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN. You may use that information for completing Your file on that film, or You can follow the rules and have a film with recorded production sound from the set plus sound editing in post production but without any finally mixed sound (which is exactly that what You hear on Your DVD).

Incomplete but happy! 

Ok, if you say that was exactly his role, I'll try and contribute it even if it's written differently than in the table. BTW, it's already listed in several profiles for Young Frankenstein.

Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
Quoting schaumi:

Quote:
So then leave out this credit! No problem.

I just confirmed that Richard Portman definitely was the Re-Recording Mixer on YOUNG FRANKENSTEIN. You may use that information for completing Your file on that film, or You can follow the rules and have a film with recorded production sound from the set plus sound editing in post production but without any finally mixed sound (which is exactly that what You hear on Your DVD).

Incomplete but happy! 

Ok, if you say that was exactly his role, I'll try and contribute it even if it's written differently than in the table. BTW, it's already listed in several profiles for Young Frankenstein.

It received 9 Yes votes and 0  No votes, and was approved and released.

Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
"Production Rerecording" is not listed in the Credits table though. And the Rule says

Quote:
For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section.

Of all the rules this must be the one I hate the most. While I understand it needs to be there, it also gives users enough fuel to remove crew which are not exactly credited as presented in that column. Luckily I can keep them local, but it really saddenst me it prevents us to share them.

Quoting pauls42:

Quote:
Quoting Martin_Zuidervliet:

Quote:
Quoting EnryWiki:

Quote:
"Production Rerecording" is not listed in the Credits table though. And the Rule says

Quote:
For each category, include only those people credited with the roles listed in the "Film Credits to Include" column. If someone is not credited with one of these roles, do not include them in the Crew section.

Of all the rules this must be the one I hate the most. While I understand it needs to be there, it also gives users enough fuel to remove crew which are not exactly credited as presented in that column. Luckily I can keep them local, but it really saddenst me it prevents us to share them.

No No - I agree totally with this rule. Make sure that every role is checked and if it differs by one full stop then it should be removed at once! In fact, check that the credit is exactly the same font as well as in the guidance notes..

And of course the same language!

EDIT: BTW if we would follow this rule to the letter (ignoring the fact that there is no "Film Credits to Include" column at all ) we could not even add a role like "written and directed by" because it is neither "written by" nor "directed by".