Registered: April 3, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 631 |
| Posted: | | | | what is the correct media company?
Echo Bridge Acquisition Corp or Echo Bridge Acquisition | | | http://www.mulligansmovies.com/ |
|
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Posts: 671 |
| Posted: | | | | The title on their website includes "Corp", so I would go with that... | | | The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet. (William Gibson) |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,695 |
| |
| T!M | Profiling since Dec. 2000 |
Registered: March 13, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 8,739 |
| Posted: | | | | Quoting GSyren: Quote: Isn't "Corp" a company suffix? If you look at the website Rander linked to, you'll immediately see that "LLC" is the company suffix. That's the one that the rules demand we drop. Also, we wouldn't drop "Corporation" from, say, "The Mirisch Corporation", right? Or drop the "C" in "BBC" ("British Broadcasting Corporation")? | | | Last edited: by T!M |
|
Registered: September 6, 2008 | Reputation: | Posts: 124 |
| Posted: | | | | The name on their website www.echobridgeac.com is actually "Echo Bridge Acquisition Corp. LLC" The contribution rules state "Omit company suffixes such as LLC, Ltd., Inc." http://www.invelos.com/dvdpro/contributions/Rules.aspx?display=filmdetailsThe contribution rules also state "There is further information about correct listings of studios and media companies, and the opportunity to ask questions if unsure, in the Contributions forum." There is also this thread. Pinned: Company suffixes and when to include them. Please read the posts in the above link, on your own, I am not copying the posts here. So in this case, I would think, we would use "Bridge Acquisition Corp." But, what ever the group / Invelos decides, our decision should be put in the pinned thread. | | | Last edited: by zappman |
|
Registered: March 14, 2007 | Reputation: | Posts: 4,695 |
| |