| Invelos Forums->Posts by The Movieman |
Page:
1  Previous Next
|
| Message |
Details |
Quoting ObiKen:
Quote:
Quoting The Movieman:
Quote:
So I was wondering, if the rating on the back is Not Rated but going to filmratings.com (where they have a database of ratings, and is the site recommended by the MPA) has something different (in the case of Barbarella, PG), which do we go with? Just to note, the new 4K release does not have a different cut while the older Blu-ray does have the PG rating on the back.
In the past, like for the profile on The Art of War where it says PG-13 but the actual rating was R, we went with the latter. Would the same go here or do we go with Not Rated?
Barbarella was initially released in the USA on 10-Oct-1968, whilst the MPAA (now MPA) introduced the motion picture rating system on 01-Nov-1968. So, the film on initial release was unrated.
The CARA "PG" rating for Barbarella refers to the 1977 re-issue (https://www.filmratings.com/Search?filmTitle=barbarella). It was marketed as "Barbarella: Queen of the Galaxy".
The 4K disc release was based on a 4K scan of the original camera negatives, not the 1977 re-issue print.
As per CARA rules, a rating certified by CARA for a motion picture may not be used in connection with the exhibition (theatrical) or distribution (home media) of any different version of that motion picture."
As per Invelos rules, Not Rated with blank rating descriptor in the 4K profile. Hope that helps.
Thanks for the explanation  | Posted: Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 243 |  | So I was wondering, if the rating on the back is Not Rated but going to filmratings.com (where they have a database of ratings, and is the site recommended by the MPA) has something different (in the case of Barbarella, PG), which do we go with? Just to note, the new 4K release does not have a different cut while the older Blu-ray does have the PG rating on the back.
In the past, like for the profile on The Art of War where it says PG-13 but the actual rating was R, we went with the latter. Would the same go here or do we go with Not Rated? | Posted: Topic Replies: 5, Topic Views: 243 | | | That one profile from the 10th still has not been approved while others submitted way later have. Tempted to resubmit, maybe it just got lost in the shuffle. | Posted: Topic Replies: 93, Topic Views: 9842 | | Happening again. While one contribution only took 5 days to be approved and released, another is still sitting there from November 10th. Nothing major being submitted (like new BY, credits) and it has 5 yes votes, 0 no votes. Not sure what gives.
Edit: In fact, the one approved 5 days later had MORE info being submitted than the other which only were features, overview and cover scans. | Posted: Topic Replies: 93, Topic Views: 9842 | | | Yeah, I had contributed 8 profiles that were approved in a day. | Posted: Topic Replies: 9, Topic Views: 3972 | | | On the top menu, select "Tools" and then "Registration Information". | Posted: Topic Replies: 1, Topic Views: 1060 | | Another option: These were released individually in 2016 in regular cases and there's a good liklihood the discs (and IDs) are the same. You can download those and then change with scans of the steelbook cases and any other changes (like the release date, SRP -- which would be $0.00, etc). Wouldn't submit them but at least locally it would be in your database even if it's by those UPC instead of disc ID. At least for now it's a solution.
The UPCs I have in my collection:
HG1 - 031398252764
HG2 - 031398252771
HG3 - 031398252788
HG4 - 031398239918 | Posted: Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 1430 | |
|
| Invelos Forums->Posts by The Movieman |
Page:
1 Previous Next
|