Shouldn't new contributions not be subjected to such close scrutiny as changes to existing profile?  I had a similar rejection with my contribution of Infernal Affairs Blu-ray profile.  Lot of work was put into making that profile and if there are certain part of the profile that the screeners don't agree with, couldn't they just reject that portion of the profile rather than the entire thing?

In any case, new contribution, by definition almost always means an incomplete profile.  Most of new contributions are going to be for a prerelease item which are going to have the wrong covers, overview, and other details.  Cast and crew information is also going to be either incomplete or from internet sources like IMDB.  I am not sure that rejecting any BRAND NEW contribution for any of these reasons is a good idea.  As long as the UPC is valid, I am of the opinion, that new contributions be accepted and wrong information be corrected later.

I agree with north. Follow the rules, that means don't be submitting Cast and Crew from anywhere other than the Actual source, that COULD be a videotape you might own of the film/TV. Don't submit any other which cannot be verified, in other words if you can't verify the Audio or Video data, for example, don't use a Ouija board to produce an answer.

Skip

Regarding your IMDb comment, xradman. READ the IMDb Terms of Use. Pre-release or NOT its use would expose Invelos to liability. LIVE WITH IT.

Skip

Quoting JaLe:

Quote:
Quoting JaLe:

Quote:
I'll try to rephrase my contribution note and give another try.

My new phrase in contribution note worked much better:

New contribution with hi-res cover images.
Cast, Crew, Runtime, Studios, Video Format, Audio Tracks and Subtitles from the movie on the DVD.
All other specs from disc and cover.

PS. Does somebody know why my italic tag is not working?

To large piece  for tag?

Quoting Evo2Me:

Quote:
Quoting pauls42:

Quote:
Thank you - at least 1 person understood the point I was making. 

Considering that not everybody is a proficient native writer of English, such [small] semantical points may not really warrant rolling eyes, disgust or reprimands. Conservative about ones own utterings, liberal against others - shouldn't that be our motto?

I'm not aware that expressed any disgust or reprimands?

My original comment was explaining why I thought it could have been misunderstood by the screeners and that the contributor should just try and re-word the comments that he had used. Which he later did and then got the contribution accepted.

Ok, I just checked and the only name in the system for Jason Mewes is the one with a birth year. Should I still change it? Will it change the others with him in the cast?