| Message |
Details |
I have a contribution with 10 yes votes standing since Dec 27. Another one from Jan 01 with no votes at all was approved on Jan 05. So, really difficult to find a pattern. I think the first one is pending as it concerns an uncredited cast addition. But just guessing.
As said, I haven't had a lost contribution so far. So it takes time but it still is alive. | Posted: Topic Replies: 34, Topic Views: 13078 |
 |
| I have new ones pending for three weeks as well, and a lot of new releases are pending from other folks for considerable time as well. So far, I beleive around three weeks was the max. time they needed. Completely new contributions need longer than changes to existing profiles, in my experience. Though to recognize a pattern probably needs an AI.... | Posted: Topic Replies: 34, Topic Views: 13078 |
|
HI, I got a contribution addition for Immaculate where I got no-votes based on the rule that production supervisors are not to be listed.
Fine with that.
The contributed roles however are supervising producers.
Now: the rules state that "Production Supervisors" are forbidden. However the role is "Supervising Producer" and the rules state "Do include "Supervising" credits in the above categories..."
Now as per https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Television_producer and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Senior_producer, Supervising producer is an active producer role.
Production supervisor, as derived from the similar https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postproduction_Supervisor, is a different role.
So: Different roles, it is not the forbidden production supervisor, so the rule to include "supervising" should be correct and the no-votes uncalled for, isn't it? | Posted: Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 2033 |
|
| No, I have the same issue since weeks. | Posted: Topic Replies: 5798, Topic Views: 398518 |
|
| if it is a first entry, then you only notice that when uploading yourself (which is then blocked) | Posted: Topic Replies: 3, Topic Views: 3512 |
|
| if it is a first entry, some base info often is enough | Posted: Topic Replies: 2, Topic Views: 2590 |
|
| if it is not mentioned somewhere, e.g. in a text or legal info on the cover that it is indeed the MGM vintage classic series, I would consider "Vintage Classics" the correct edition. | Posted: Topic Replies: 8, Topic Views: 7279 |
|
| I put it in as a formal "ticket", for whatever it's worth. No answer however. | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 9421 |
|
| I confirm this error. It is independent on the browser, checked with Chrome and Edge. | Posted: Topic Replies: 10, Topic Views: 9421 |
|
Paul King is not yet in the list http://www.luigifilocamo.it/BY.html#K, but I find at least two:
Director of Wonka and Paddington 2, his BY given as 1978 in wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_King_(director)
Story writer of Operation Petticoat, living from 1926-1996 https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0455126/?ref_=ttfc_fc_wr3
Will submit updates for those films in my possession (update: at some point in time as currently this cannot be submitted, get a error here) | Posted: Topic Replies: 5798, Topic Views: 398518 |
|