Welcome to the Invelos forums. Please read the forum rules before posting.

Read access to our public forums is open to everyone. To post messages, a free registration is required.

If you have an Invelos account, sign in to post.

    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next
When the running time of a 4K disc isn't the same as that of the accompanying Blu-ray...
Author Message
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,667
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
When faced with the two-disc set consisting of a 4K Ultra HD disc plus a Blu-ray disc, but both discs contain different cuts (i.e. the 4K disc has the theatrical version while the Blu-ray has an extended cut), then which running time prevails? Should that be the running time of the "main" media type, that would be the 4K Ultra HD disc, or should it be that of the extended cut only found on the accompanying Blu-ray disc? The rules aren't really clear on this. There's the bit that says:
Quote:
For branching titles, or those with multiple versions (e.g. Theatrical and Director's Cut) on the same disc, use the longest running time.

But that explicitly says "on the same disc" - that's not the case here.

Then there's this:
Quote:
Sets containing the same film on multiple media types (such as a Blu-ray/DVD combo pack) are to be entered as a normal profile for the main media type (Blu-ray in this example), with all included media types checked. A combo which includes HD media (HD-DVD, Blu-ray) as well as DVD should use the details from the HD media in the main profile. However, you may add an additional profile by Disc ID for the DVD content and add this profile to the Box Set contents for the Blu-ray profile.

4K isn't mentioned in this, but I gather that the idea is to favor the "highest quality" disc. So should I use the (shorter) running time that's on the 4K disc, then?

Of course, I understand that I can add a separate, Disc ID-based child profile for the Blu-ray disc, in which I can profile all of that disc's properties. There's obviously no question what to list there, but that child profile is optional - it's still important to know what we want to want to put into the main profile. Is it "always use the longest running time", or is it "use the running time of the 'best' media type"?
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorWigram
Don't blink!
Registered: June 6, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Canada Posts: 949
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
.
 Last edited: by Wigram
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributormreeder50
I was outta bullets
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
United States Posts: 2,716
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Each disc should speak for itself, not that of the package...that's why we have children.
Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorT!M
Profiling since Dec. 2000
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 8,667
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Quoting mreeder50:
Quote:
Each disc should speak for itself, not that of the package...that's why we have children.

But children are optional, so, as I already said, we still have to decide what we put into the main profile. And that main profile, like it or not, does speak for *both* discs. That already starts at the "Media Type" field, which lists *both* media types. And then there's the features: it seems general practice that the main profile does not only list features that are present on the 4K disc, but also those that are present on the Blu-ray disc. Again, there's no question what to list in the (optional) child profile for the Blu-ray disc. The question I'm asking here is what to put in the parent, and "each disc should speak for itself" does not answer that.

Personally, I feel the running time of the 4K disc should prevail, but I just wanted to be sure.
 Last edited: by T!M
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorDJ Doena
Registered: May 1, 2002
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Germany Posts: 6,738
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I think the intention is to take the longest cut on the highest resolution but more weight to the resolution.

So the road would be:

1) Find highest resolution, in this case 4K

2) Find longest cut in that resolution, in this case theatrical


The reason for this approach is that usually you buy something for the higher resolution and anything with lower res is just "by-catch"
Karsten
DVD Collectors Online

 Last edited: by DJ Doena
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorDanae Cassandra
Registered: Apr 11, 2004
Registered: May 26, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
United States Posts: 2,877
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree with DJ Doena - I think it should be the 4K runtime - but for different reason.

A 4K film is definitely advertised for the 4K.  The blu-ray is an included bonus (even if most include them).  The blu-ray profile is a child profile, therefore it is not the "main" profile.  Thus the 4K is the main, and it's information should include the info for the film as it exists on that disc.
If more of us valued food and cheer and song above hoarded gold, it would be a merrier world.
-- Thorin Oakenshield
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributormreeder50
I was outta bullets
Registered: March 29, 2007
Reputation: Superior Rating
United States Posts: 2,716
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree with Karsten and Danae Cassandra.
Marty - Registered July 10, 2004, User since 2002.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorMallrat
Registered: December 13, 2008
Reputation: High Rating
Netherlands Posts: 334
Posted:
PM this userDirect link to this postReply with quote
Also agree.
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorGSyren
Profiling since 2001
Registered: March 14, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Sweden Posts: 4,523
Posted:
PM this userVisit this user's homepageView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Ditto
My freeware tools for DVD Profiler users.
Gunnar
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorHotm@iler
Live life to the max!
Registered: May 30, 2007
Reputation: Great Rating
Netherlands Posts: 258
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Totally agree.
DVD Profiler for iOS since: January 9, 2011 (no longer using)
DVD Profiler for Android since: June 6, 2013
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar ContributorGreyHulk
Fixin' it for everyone..
Registered: November 24, 2008
Reputation: Highest Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,221
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree. If it's a 4K release, then take the Running Time from the 4K version.
 Last edited: by GreyHulk
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar Contributordee1959jay
Registered: March 19, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
Netherlands Posts: 6,014
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Agreed.
DVD Profiler Desktop and Mobile RegistrantStar Contributoreommen
DVD nerd
Registered: March 13, 2007
Reputation: High Rating
Netherlands Posts: 485
Posted:
PM this userEmail this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
Agree with Danae Cassandra.

Perhaps good to remember that, at the time of introduction of 4K, the industry decided to include the BluRay with every 4K (UHD) release under the assumption you'd still be in the process of buying a 4K-player. And if 4K wouldn't catch on, you'd always have the BluRay as fall-back.

As a side effect it allowed the industry to leave the extras only on the BluRay and use the "maximum space" for the 4K video file. Between brackets of course due to the number of audio tracks on the 4K disk.

So 4K is the main release and that length should be in the profile.
Eric

If it is important, say it. Otherwise, let silence speak.
 Last edited: by eommen
DVD Profiler Unlimited RegistrantStar ContributorNosferatu
Registered: March 24, 2007
Reputation: Highest Rating
United Kingdom Posts: 1,204
Posted:
PM this userView this user's DVD collectionDirect link to this postReply with quote
I agree with the majority here. The 4K Ultra HD disc is the primary format and the profile should reflect the running time, audio tracks, subtitles etc. from the disc. The Blu-ray disc is almost a secondary feature and a child profile – with the longer running time – would reflect that.
    Invelos Forums->DVD Profiler: Contribution Discussion Page: 1  Previous   Next